Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource project Informal/Formal Connections
The CEDERS program is designed to prioritize community engaged scholarship in educational research projects led by postdoctoral fellows and done in collaboration with STEM researchers and community stakeholders.
DATE: -
TEAM MEMBERS: Shalaunda Reeves Courtney Faber Elizabeth Derryberry Frances Harper Stephanie Drumheller-Horton
resource evaluation Informal/Formal Connections
This document is the final evaluation report for the project, which focuses both on formative evaluation of the collaborative+interdisciplinary presentation creation process and summative evaluation of audience learning outcomes. 
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Justin Reeves Meyer Donnelley (Dolly) Hayde Laura Weiss
resource research Higher Education Programs
The project team published a research synopsis article with Futurum Science Careers in Feb 2023 called “How Can Place Attachment Improve Scientific Literacy?”
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Julia Parrish Benjamin Haywood
resource evaluation Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
This report presents summative evaluation results for a National Science Foundation funded project entitled Grounding Institutional Partnerships in Structures for Broader Impacts Design (BID). The project represents a collaboration between five institutions: Institute for Learning Innovation, The STEM Research Center at Oregon State University, Scicenter, University of Washington-Bothell, and University of Wisconsin-Madison. BID aimed at creating an inter-institutional structure and toolkit to assist higher education institutions (HEIs) and informal science education organizations (ISEs) in
DATE:
resource research Media and Technology
This short (approximately 2-3 hours), self-paced non-credit learning module is designed for those new to conducting research in communities impacted by energy development. You will learn about the concept of “research fatigue” and become more prepared for fieldwork by learning what to expect when you visit energy-impacted communities. Access is free for students, researchers and those living in or serving communities impacted by energy development. Participants who complete the online course can a digital badge called Understanding Research Fatigue. Earners of this certification will
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Suzi Taylor Julia Hobson Haggerty Kristin Smith Ruchie Pathak
resource research Public Programs
This workbook / planning guide was designed as an outreach tool to support students and early-career researchers who are studying the social impacts of energy development and wish to better understand and mitigate “research fatigue,” a state in which citizens of a community who are already experiencing massive change may be exhausted by additional attention from researchers, the media and others outside the community. The workbook can be used as a stand-alone resource or as a complement to the Understanding Research Fatigue online module (https://eu.courses.montana.edu/CourseStatus.awp
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Suzi Taylor Julia Hobson Haggerty Jeffrey Jacquet Gene Theodori Kathryn Bills Walsh
resource research Informal/Formal Connections
Many studies have examined the impression that the general public has of science and how this can prevent girls from choosing science fields. Using an online questionnaire, we investigated whether the public perception of several academic fields was gender-biased in Japan. First, we found the gender-bias gap in public perceptions was largest in nursing and mechanical engineering. Second, people who have a low level of egalitarian attitudes toward gender roles perceived that nursing was suitable for women. Third, people who have a low level of egalitarian attitudes perceived that many STEM
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Yuko Ikkatai Azusa Minamizaki Kei Kano Atsushi Inoue Euan McKay Hiromi M. Yokoyama
resource research Public Programs
An independent evaluator and a group of investigators from three AISL projects focused on public engagement with science (PES) collaborated on a paper about research-practice partnerships for PES. This two-page brief summarizes their key points.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Karen Peterman John Besley Sue Allen Kathy Fallon Lambert Nalini Nadkarni Mark Rosin Caitlin Weber Marissa Weiss Jen Wong
resource research Public Programs
Community voice, alongside academic voice, is essential to the core community engagement principle of reciprocity—the seeking, recognizing, respecting, and incorporating the knowledge, perspectives, and resources that each partner brings to a collaboration. Increasing the extent to which academic conferences honor reciprocity with community members is important for many reasons. For example, community perspectives often enhance knowledge generation and potentially transform scholarship, practice, and outcomes for all stakeholders. However, community presence and participation at academic
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Emily Janke
resource research Public Programs
Poster presentation from the 2020 Association of Science and Technology Centers Annual Conference. This poster presented preliminary findings from a configurative literature synthesis on how the literature posted on the InformalScience.org website, in peer-reviewed journals, and in the ProQuest archive of Theses and Dissertations report about how informal learning institutions are advancing the use of STEM knowledge and scientific reasoning in the ways that can help individuals and communities address the societal challenges of our time?
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: John Fraser kris morrissey Rebecca Norlander Terri Ball Kate Flinner
resource research Media and Technology
The study contributes to mediatization research. Mediatization is understood as a process during which individual and collective actors adapt towards the demands of publicity and public attention. The manuscript introduces a differentiation of mediatization strategies, ranging from defensive to offensive strategies. This conceptual differentiation is applied empirically regarding relevant stakeholders within the German science-policy constellation from politics, science, and science funding. Results are based on 35 in-depth interviews with decision makers. The results section deals with
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Andreas Scheu
resource research Media and Technology
This commentary aims to shed light on the neglected space of queer people in science communication. In this piece, we introduce queer theory to science communication literature to examine issues from the past, present, and future. We argue that to queer our field may entail a radical interrogation of some of science communication's deeply rooted cultural traits and working towards a rainbow-tinted future.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Tara Roberson Lindy Orthia