Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation Public Programs
The Review of NISE Network Evaluation Findings: Years 1-5 seeks to investigate the work of the NISE Network since its inception in 2005 and provide an overarching summary of NISE Net Public Impacts evaluation efforts to the NISE Network and the broader ISE field.
DATE:
resource evaluation Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
The documents that comprise the Inverness Research Summative Report provide a comprehensive and systematic review of the progress made in developing a network organization capable of supporting nanoscience education for the public on a national scale.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Mark St. John Jenifer V. Helms Pam Castori Judy Hirabayashi Laurie Lopez Michelle Phillips
resource project Media and Technology
Over three years, Science Central is producing 624 television segments that will present current, ongoing research through local newscasts on ABC and NBC stations nationwide. In addition to the regular research segments, ScienCentral will produce six "sweeps" series per year focusing on important new fields of research including: nanotechnology, genetics/genomics, ocean science, global climate change and brain sciences. An advisory board of scientists, teachers, science journalists and public information officers help inform the producers about individual stories and evolving fields of research, and they provide access to scientists and field research. They also provide scientific input and check the stories for accuracy. To facilitate production and to assure that research is covered on an international basis, ScienCentral will establish a footage consortium to exchange science news video with major Canadian and European newscasters. They also will provide the news stories to science centers for use in their interactive exhibits and web sites.
DATE: -
TEAM MEMBERS: Eliene Augenbraun
resource research Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
Details on use and privacy policy for the NISE Network and NSF. Includes guidelines, forms and logos.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: NISE Network Christine Reich
resource research Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
We've created a selection of useful products to help members of NISE Network promote the network within their own institution or with potential collaborators. These materials are updated regularly.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: NISE Network
resource research Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
A Powerpoint presentation providing a NISE Network overview (June 2011 and October 2012).
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: NISE Network
resource research Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
Because the NISE Network bridges the cultures of museums and the academic research world, participants from one profession may not always know the lingo of the other. At the same time, a shared vocabulary is essential for educators and researchers who want to truly collaborate on projects such as writing grant proposals. Therefore, we present the NISE Network Glossary of Two Worlds.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: NISE Network
resource research Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
As a part of the strategy to reach the NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Science Education and Public Outreach Forum Objective 1.2: Provide resources and opportunities to enable sharing of best practices relevant to SMD education and public outreach (E/PO), the Informal Education Working Group members designed a nationally-distributed online survey to answer the following questions: 1. How, when, where, and for how long do informal educators prefer to receive science, mathematics, engineering, and/or technology content professional development? 2. What are the professional development and
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: NASA Science Mission Directorate Education and Public Outreach Forums Informal Education Working Group Lindsay Bartolone Suzanne Gurton Keliann LaConte Andrea Jones
resource project Public Programs
Maker Corps increases the capacity of youth-serving organizations nationwide to engage youth and families in making. Diverse Maker Corps Members expand the current network of makers, mentors, and community leaders poised to lead creative experiences for youth. In the Maker Corps' second year evaluation report, we address the following questions: 1. How does Maker Corps impact the Maker Corps Members, participating Host Sites, and the audiences they serve? 2. In what ways can the Maker Corps program improve to better serve these participants and their audiences? We developed an evaluation plan with two primary methods: surveys and case studies. We surveyed all Maker Corps Members and Host Sites at multiple points during their service year. This method allowed us to get a broad look at Maker Ed's impact across the Maker Corps program. We balanced this approach by conducting case studies at three Host Sites, which allowed us to get a deeper, more specific look at Maker Ed's impact.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Science Museum of Minnesota Alice Anderson Al Onkka Joseph Schantz