Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation Public Programs
The Monterey Bay Aquarium is planning to redesign existing conservation-related interactives as well as add new experiences on the Aquarium floor. In preparation for this project, the Aquarium sought to gain a better understanding of visitors’ awareness of and engagement in conservation-related actions and responses to conservation-related messaging. The Aquarium contracted with MWA Insights to conduct a front-end evaluation study to help inform the planning for these conservation stations. Specifically, the evaluation sought to understand: Are visitors aware of issues affecting the
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Maia Werner-Avidon Jennifer Rigney Elise Walmsley Cindy Serraino
resource evaluation Exhibitions
With funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services’ (IMLS) Museums for America program, the Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden (Zoo) undertook a process of improving the interpretive experience of its Wings of the World exhibit, which concluded in summer 2018. The updated exhibition sought to enhance families’ connections to nature and inspire them to become better bird neighbors, in direct alignment with the Zoo’s strategic planning. In collaboration with the Zoo, the Lifelong Learning Group (LLG) conducted formative and summative evaluation in spring and summer 2018. The
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Shasta Bray David Jenike Dolly Hayde E. Elaine T. Horr Joe E Heimlich
resource evaluation Public Programs
This document contains the following Appendices that provide information for the I/CaLL Community Science Learning study. Appendix A: StreamLines Events Appendix B: StreamLines Events Survey Instrument Appendix C: Art + Science Brainstorm Coding Themes Appendix D: Art + Science Brainstorm Flyer
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: John Fraser Nezam Ardalan
resource evaluation Public Programs
This set of appendices represent all research instruments related to study presented in the I/CaLL Art Experiences and Advancing Science Literacy report (NewKnowledge Publication #NSF.097.115.07). Appendix A: Installation Site Intercept Interview Instrument Appendix B: Artists-Scientists Walk & Talks Instrument Appendix C: Post-Performance Event Survey Instrument Note that researchers did not use an instrument for the fourth aspect of the study, the post-performance event reflection sessions. Instead, they allowed the discussions to be directed by the reflection participants.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: John Fraser Rebecca Joy Norlander Sophie Swanson Nezam Ardalan Kate Flinner Joanna Laursen Brucker Nicole LaMarca