Skip to main content
COMMUNITY:
Research Brief

The value of both talking and writing for learning to argue in science

August 1, 2011
Science is often seen by students to be a body of incontrovertible facts. If, however, we emphasise the methods in which scientific ideas and explanations are exchanged, challenged and negotiated, students may come to understand the rich and dynamic patterns of science, and thus find it more engaging. The Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach tries to do just this by scaffolding students in using different forms of language to engage in inquiry leading to the generation and defence of a science dispute. This paper may be of particular interest to ISE practitioners who are involved in supporting students to engage in debates and other forms of communication requiring the skills of argumentation.

TEAM MEMBERS

  • 2014 10 22 Heather KING
    Author
    King’s College London
  • Citation

    Discipline: Education and learning science
    Audience: Educators/Teachers | Museum/ISE Professionals | Evaluators

    If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.