Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation
The tool was created by 4H Nebraska to measure students’ (7-10th graders ) learning and attitudes towards science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The tool also assesses students’ attitude about GPS (Global Positioning Systems) and GIS (Geographical Imaging Systems).
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Bradley Barker Debra K. Meier
resource evaluation
To evaluate the reasons for students in abandoning the science, engineering, and medical (SEM) pipeline while others choosing to continue. The influence of family and teachers on students’ goals in science, activities, and science identity is considered.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Pamela R. Aschbacher Erika Li Ellen J. Roth
resource evaluation
Measures students' attitudes towards science related to such factors as students' perceptions of the science teacher, anxiety toward science, value of science in society, self-concept toward science and desire to do science.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Molly H. Weinburgh Donald Steele
resource evaluation Informal/Formal Connections
The New Ecological Paradigm for Children is modeled after the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) and the New Ecological Paradigm-Revised (NEP-Revised) for adults. The survey contains 10 questions assessing three subscales that contribute to one’s “environmental world view” including “rights of nature,” “eco-crisis,” and “human exceptionalism.”
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Constantinos C. Manoli Bruce Johnson Riley E. Dunlap
resource evaluation
LAESE is designed to identify longitudinal changes in the self-efficacy of undergraduate students studying engineering. (see AWE Self-Efficacy Literature Overview and Information on Self-Efficacy). LAESE can be used with any students studying engineering. A High School instrument, based on LAESE, was developed and tested by the Female Recruits Explore Engineering (FREE) Project.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Pennsylvania State University University of Missouri
resource evaluation
Assesses children's interest in, attitude towards, and experiences in science and technology, as well as their opinion about environmental challenges and career aspirations.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Svein Sjøberg
resource evaluation
The Science Motivation Questionnaire II is a reliable and validated survey that assesses science motivation based on 5-factors (intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, career motivation, self-determination, grade motivation).
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Shawn Glynn
resource evaluation
Assesses current interest and attitudes in science activities at school.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Helen Gibson Christopher Chase
resource evaluation
The inventory consists of eleven items, each representing a different skill in the science inquiry process. Youth are prompted to respond to each statement using a 4-point Likert scale indicating how often they practice each of the items when doing science: Never (1), sometimes (2), usually (3), and always (4). Recommended scoring of the SPSI is the calculation of a composite science process skills score. This is calculated by summing the individual ratings for each item. The score range for the composite score is 11-44.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Mary E. Arnold Virginia Bourdeau
resource evaluation
Assesses students interest in science, their attitudes toward science, their views of scientists, and their desire to become scientists.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Richard W. Moore Rachel Leigh Hill Foy
resource evaluation
"Monitors" students' views concerning the epistemological, social & technological aspects of science.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Glen S. Aikenhead Alan G. Ryan Reg W. Fleming
resource research Public Programs
The Dimensions of Success (DoS) observation tool defines and provides rubrics (with levels 1-4) for 12 dimensions that were developed to measure STEM program quality in out-of-school time. This technical report summarizes the development of the instrument and findings from our initial study that included 284 observations in the field across 58 STEM programs in two geographic regions (New England and the Midwest). Data were collected by 46 trained observers who observed in pairs. This report is the initial step in developing a validity argument for the instrument.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Ashima Mathur Shah Caroline Wylie Drew Gitomer