Science communicators must consider short-term objectives while keeping their eyes on the prize

Most scientists say they got into science to make the world a better place and recognize this means sharing what they learn with a range of other people. But deciding to engage also means deciding what to communicate, and it’s at this stage that things get complicated. Scientists’ most important communication decision may be figuring out their goals. Do they want to help shape local, state or national policy discussions? Do they want to influence individual behavior, such as diet choices, medical decisions or career paths? Big-picture goal choice is, however, relatively simple, as it likely originates from scientists’ research, resources and personal preferences. As public engagement researchers, we suggest the quality of science communication actually hinges on a second set of decisions. Scientists need to figure out what specific, immediate objectives they want to achieve through their communication efforts.

If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.