Outlaw, hackers, victorian amateurs: diagnosing public participation in the life sciences today

March 22nd, 2010 | RESEARCH

This essay reflects on three figures that can be used to make sense of the changing nature of public participation in the life sciences today: outlaws, hackers and Victorian gentlemen. Occasioned by a symposium held at UCLA (Outlaw Biology: Public Participation in the Age of Big Bio), the essay introduces several different modes of participation (DIY Bio, Bio Art, At home clinical genetics, patient advocacy and others) and makes three points: 1) that public participation is first a problem of legitimacy, not legality or safety; 2) that public participation is itself enabled by and thrives on the infrastructure of mainstream biology; and 3) that we need a new set of concepts (other than inside/outside) for describing the nature of public participation in biological research and innovation today.

Document

(no document provided)

Team Members

Christopher Kelty, Author, University of California, Los Angeles

Citation

Identifier Type: issn
Identifier: 1824-2049

Publication: Journal of Science Communication
Volume: 9
Number: 1

Related URLs

Full Text

Tags

Audience: General Public | Scientists
Discipline: Health and medicine | Life science
Resource Type: Mass Media Article | Reference Materials
Environment Type: Citizen Science Programs | Public Programs

Linkedin   Youtube   Facebook   Instagram
Search: repository | repository and website pages | website pages
NSF logo

This material is supported by National Science Foundation award DRL-2229061, with previous support under DRL-1612739, DRL-1842633, DRL-1212803, and DRL-0638981. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained within InformalScience.org are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.

NSF AISL Project Meetings

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us