Skip to main content
COMMUNITY:
Peer-reviewed article

Socio-cognitive perverse effects in peer review Reflections and proposals

September 21, 2003 | Media and Technology, Informal/Formal Connections
Peer review is the evaluation method that has characterized the scientific growth of the last four centuries, the first four of what is called modern science, indeed. It is matter of scientific communication inside scientific community, a subject too poorly studied in comparison with its critical importance for a scientific study of science (science of science). Peer review has been used for scientific paper evaluation before publication (editorial peer review) and for research proposal evaluation before financial support (grants peer review). Both cases present similar pros and cons, so I will treat them as a unique method for scientific evaluation. While the method remained pretty unchanged all along the period, apart from communication technology with peers, science has tremendously changed its organization and its relevance to society. So, peer review is antique and well rooted in practise, but its historical aim should now to be contrasted with the present situation of actual research, practises and social involvement of science.

TEAM MEMBERS

  • Andrea Cerroni
    Author
    University of Milan-Bicocca
  • Citation

    ISSN : 1824-2049
    Publication Name: Journal of Science Communication
    Volume: 2
    Number: 3
    Resource Type: Research Products
    Discipline: General STEM | Nature of science | Social science and psychology
    Audience: Administration/Leadership/Policymakers | Scientists
    Environment Type: Media and Technology | Comics, Books, and Newspapers | Informal/Formal Connections | Higher Education Programs

    If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.